P
Collected on:
DONT TO USE ASHLEY SMITH FOR YOUR APPEAL. - ESP IF YOU’RE THE 49 yr ol
DONT TO USE ASHLEY SMITH FOR YOUR APPEAL. - ESP IF YOU’RE THE 49 yr old AURIOL GRAY (CEREBRAL PALSY) SENT TO PRISON FOR 3Yrs FOR SHOUTING AT CYCLIST WHO CAME TOO CLOSE TO HER WALKING.
A WHOLE MONTH WASTED. THEN THEY TAKE ONLY MINUTES TO QUICKLY SNUB MY COMPLEX CASE OUT OF HAND.
FROM EVERYTHING FROM NEW EVIDENCE, MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT, UNFAIR TRIAL, JUDGE MISDIRECTIONS/RULINGS TO LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE INCOMPETENCE. - ASHLEY SMITH GLIBLY DECLARE:
THAT THESE SHOULDVE BEEN DONE AT YOUR TRIAL
THESE CRIMINAL APPEAL SOLICITORS REVIEWS AT GOOGLE, et al, ARE BAD BUT ITS WORSE THAN THAT. - If it was only them being rude or putting the phone down.
THEY ARE WORSE THAN PREJUDICED AND WORSE THAN USELESS.
THEY WASTED A WHOLE MONTH OF MY TIME I WILL NEVER GET BACK. — I’M GLAD NOT IN PRISON SO FAR.
ADMIN IS INCOMPETENT BUT THATS THE LEAST OF IT.
FIRSTLY A WHOLE WEEK WAS WASTED. IT TOOK A WHOLE WEEK FOR THEIR APPEAL PACK TO ARRVE. - THEY PROBABLY SENT IT 3rd/4th CLASS POST. - IN KEEPING UP WITH THEIR SOCIO-ECONOMIC CLASS OF POTENTIAL CLIENTS.
THEY CHANGED THEIR ADDRESS BUT THEY NOT UPDATED THEIR APPEAL PACK ENVELOPE. NOW FEBRUARYS HAS BEEN ‘LOST’ BY THE PUBLIC SPIRITED THIEFS IN THE POSTAL SERVICE.
AND WITH IT ALL MY EXTREMELY PERSONAL DATA+INFO. AND MY EXTREMELY DEEP DATA+INFO.
NOT REPLYING OR ON THEIR PROVIDED ADDRESS ENVELOPE. — I HAD TO PAY EXTRA TWICE BY TRACK&TRACE IN FEB THEN MARCH.
THEIR INCOMPETENCE MEANS IT TOOK A WHOLE MONTH TO GET MY APPEAL EVEN LOOKED AT BY THEM. — THEN LASTLY MY VERY DETAILED APPEAL (I filled in all of it.) WAS DISMISSED IN MINUTES BY THEM. —
ASHLEY SMITH ONLY OFFER CASUAL GLIBNESS, CASUAL PREJUDICE. MIXED WITH CASUAL LAZYNESS ABOUT CASES.
GENUINE+OBVIOUS PREJUDICE WITH OBVIOUS LAWYERLY GLIBNESS ABOUT:
THAT SHOULDVE BEEN BROUGHT UP AT ORIGINAL TRIAL.
AND FUNDING DOESNT JUSTIFY APPEAL EVEN IF YOU PAY YOURSELF. - Eg: ITS NOT A AN IMPORTANT MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE LIKE VINCENT HICKEY AND THE GUILDFORD 4 + BIRMINGHAM 6.
DO NOT USE ASHLEY SMITH FOR YOUR CRIMINAL APPEALS TO COURT OF APPEAL.
ASHLEY SMITH AND THEIR TYPICAL WOMEN RECEPTIONISTS SHOULD EXIST TO BE THE SHOWN UP FOR WHAT THEY ARE. - ALSO NONE OF THEM OR ITS CEO ASHLEY SMITH DID NOT CALL ME BY WHAT I PUT DOWN IN THEIR APPEAL FORMS.
ASHLEY SMITH KNOWING ITS OUT OF THE SCHOOL TERM HOLIDAYS. — MOREOVER, AND KNOWING THAT I CANNOT APPEAL. — BUT ONLY WANTS TO SPEND NEARLY £1000 TO MEET IS TO SEE ME WEARING SCHOOL UNIFORM. AND SEE IF I WILL ACTUALLY WILL WEAR SCHOLL UNIFORM. —. THEY WOULD PROBABLY GOOD £1000 SPENT FROM
THEIR VIEWED APERTURE.
(GUESS WHAT IT IS REAL BIOLOGICAL BOYS AND GIRLS - AND ITS CERTAINLY NOT EVER GOING TO BE OVER 16’s OR OVER 18’s.)
SOME PROBABLY THINK THIS IS NOT A GENUINE HEARTFELT REVIEW ‘COS I DIDNT ISE MY FULL NAME. - DO YOU THINK IM GOING TO USE MY REAL NAME ON THE RAPACIOUS+GREEDY SNAKE LIKE GOOGLE.
ASHLEY SMITH KNOW FULL WELL WHO I AM.
Was this review helpful?
