Get advice now

Get advice now

Treadstone Law Limited

01614908960

Also known as :

  • Treadstone Law Solicitors
View map
Treadstone Law Limited

Rankings by area of expertise

The rankings below show the areas of expertise that Treadstone Law Limited offers to clients. You can see how good the service offered is in comparison to all other law firms nationally.

Data shown above is based on the reviews and client feedback collected by ReviewSolicitors over the last 12 months.

Become Verified

Treadstone Law Limited has Not Been Verified by ReviewSolicitors

You may want to discover a firm with an established and proven reputation on ReviewSolicitors


Top Rated Law Firms - Highly Recommended and Recently Used By Clients Like You

Review Sources

Client Review

1.0/5

Reviews summary

  • Excellent

    0
  • Very Good

    0
  • Average

    0
  • Poor

    0
  • Awful

    1

Overall experience

  • Value For Money
  • Communication
  • Initial Impressions
  • Approachability
  • Documentation Accuracy
  • Legal knowledge
Adam

Adam

March 26, 2024

Report to admin

Collected on:

So bad it is like a joke

1) discovered CCJ on credit report.

2) decided to hire solicitors to help me remove and fell for Treadstone’s fake reviews online.

3) Treadstone began with good comms up until…

4) Paid Treadstone. Treadstone all but disappear. Treadstone treat every request for an update as unreasonable.

5) Raise internal complaint due to lack of action within reasonable timeframe.

6) Treadstone finally start working on case.

7) Continued unexplained delays prompt me to write negative review online.

8) Stuart Matthews calls me, refuses to communicate in writing, threatens legal action for defamation.

9) Treadstone strongly insinuate they will stop working on and sabotage my case if I leave a negative review up. Treadstone refuse to communicate in any way other than by post. They have refused communication for over 6 months at this stage.

10) I receive a number of poorly written threats of legal action for “deformation”. Letter is strewn with mistakes (spelling and legal) making me realise I have hired amateurs.

11) One year later I still have a CCJ and a solicitor who took payment but refuses to work. I ring the courts and find out Treadstone filled out the N244 form incorrectly (lots of errors) and, despite being informed of this, failed to notify their paying client or correct their errors.

12) Compiling all evidence to report Treadstone Law Solicitors to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and contacting other disgruntled clients to help prove a clear pattern of behaviour.

Not good enough that this firm is able to do business this way as an accredited firm. I have all evidence to back up this review. I would never recommend this law firm to anyone unless I wanted to be sure to beat that person in court.

Was this review helpful?

About this branch

Regulated by

Solicitors Regulation Authority

Legal services

Personal areas of law

  • Clinical Negligence
    • Accident and Emergency Claims
    • Amputation Negligence Claims
    • Anaesthetic Awareness Claims
    • Birth Defect and Wrongful Birth Claims
    • Birth Injury Claims
    • Birth Injury To Mother Claims
    • Blood Transfusion Claims
    • Bowel Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Breast Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Breast Surgery Compensation Claims
    • C. Difficile Claims
    • Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Cauda Equina Syndrome Claims
    • Cerebral Palsy Claims
    • Cervical Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Clinical Negligence
    • Cochlear Implant Claims
    • Cosmetic Dentistry Claims
    • Cosmetic Surgery Claims
    • Defective Medical Device Claims
    • Dental Negligence
    • Dental Negligence Claims
    • Dermal Filler Compensation Claims
    • Diabetes Claims
    • Erb’s Palsy Compensation Claims
    • Eye Surgery Claims
    • Failed Sterilisation Claims
    • Fatal Medical Negligence Claims and Inquests
    • Faulty Defibrillator Claims
    • Fertility Negligence Claims
    • GP Negligence Claims
    • Group B Streptococcus Claims
    • Hospital Negligence Claims
    • Knee Replacement Claims
    • Laser Eye Surgery Claims
    • Laser Treatment Claims
    • Lung Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • MRSA Claims
    • Medical Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Medical Negligence
    • Meningitis Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Metal-On-Metal Hip Replacement Claims
    • Misdiagnosed Miscarriage Claims
    • Nerve Damage Claims
    • Nerve Injury Claims
    • Ophthalmic Negligence Claims
    • Oral Cancer Claims
    • Orthopaedic Negligence Claims
    • Ovarian Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Pancreatic Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Periodontal Disease Claims
    • Pregnancy and Gynaecology Injury Claims
    • Pressure Sore Claims
    • Prostate Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Restorative Dentistry Claims
    • Sepsis Negligence Claims
    • Skin Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Sorin Stockert 3T Heater-Cooler Claims
    • Spinal Surgery Claims
    • Stillbirth Compensation Claims
    • Stroke Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Surgery Compensation Claims
    • Surgical and Transvaginal Mesh Claims
    • Testicular Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
  • Consumer
    • Consumer Disputes
    • Litigation - Breach of contract
    • Litigation - Insurance disputes
    • Litigation - M&A and warranty disputes
    • Litigation - Product liability claims
    • Litigation - Property litigation claims
    • Litigation - Trust and pension issues
    • Litigation Law
  • Personal Injury
    • Against The Council
    • Benefits Available To Asbestos Victims
    • Diffuse Mesothelioma Payment Scheme
    • Gym Injury Compensation
    • Personal Injury Law
    • Welfare Issues After Serious Injury

Business areas of law

  • Regulations
    • Environment