Mee
Do Not Trust This Firm
Iqbal Ahmed Partner in this firm is someone not to be trusted, He colludes with Police and Prosecutors for your own peace of mind, find another firm as this one is not to be Trusted!
-
Regulated by: The Solicitors Regulation Authority
-
Regulator ID: 139220
-
Based in London
-
Licensed for 38 years
Not accepting new clients via ReviewSolicitors
-
Regulated by: The Solicitors Regulation Authority
-
Regulator ID: 139220
-
Based in London
-
Licensed for 38 years
Iqbal Ahmed
ReviewSolicitors Suitability Check
See availability
Expertise
Costs
In your own words, tell us what you need help with and we’ll show you how this law firm may be able to assist, based on their experience and client feedback.
Please enter a search query before checking suitability.
Our AI couldn’t identify the legal issue in that search 🤔 Try describing the legal problem in a different way.
Awful
Value for
Money
Money
Value for money
About this score
This rating is based on verified client feedback and compares how this firm’s value for money is perceived against the national average. In legal services, value for money is not about being the cheapest option, but about whether clients feel the service, expertise, and outcome justified the cost. This comparison helps place client experiences in context when choosing a law firm.
Success
Rate
Rate
Satisfied with outcome
About this score
This rating is based on client feedback and compares how satisfied people were with the result of their legal matter against the national average for similar legal services. While every case is different and outcomes can depend on the law, the facts, and decisions made by courts or tribunals, this comparison is designed to be like for like.
When a firm has a large number of reviews, individual case differences tend to balance out over time. This makes the national average a useful benchmark for understanding how often clients feel the result achieved was fair and appropriate for their situation. Even small differences from the average can therefore reflect a meaningful difference in the overall standard of legal service provided.
Would
Recommend
Recommend
Would recommend to friends and family
About this score
This score shows how likely clients are to recommend this law firm to friends or family, based on verified reviews and compared with the national average. In legal matters, recommendations are usually based on trust, clarity of advice, and how supported clients felt throughout their case. This comparison helps show how consistently a firm meets those expectations.
Communication
1.0/5
Initial Impressions
1.0/5
Approachability
1.0/5
Documentation Accuracy
1.0/5
Legal Knowledge
1.0/5
Value for money
1.0/5
Expertise
See all 5 practice areasLanguages spoken
- English
- Hindi
- Punjabi
- Urdu
Iqbal Ahmed, is this your profile?
Claiming your profile is free and easy! Highlight your professional experience, availability, and contact details. Monitor and respond to new reviews with instant notifications, or report them as needed. Boost your online presence and track profile visits with our analytics.
Claim your profile!67a Camden High Street, London, NW1 7JL
Reviews
1.0
/5
2 Reviews
Filter your results
Star rating
Rating
ReviewSolicitors Review List
Ri
Think again
I would rather not discuss my case in detail until the time is right, but feel a public duty to warn people off of this particular chap. I was remanded on a complete and utter lie, which could easily and quickly be disproven by reference to my phone bills and social media. But did he get that into court? Remember, I was on 23 hour plus lock up and reliant upon my lawyer. Iqbal Ahmed of Ahmed and Co. allowed the disclosure deadline to pass without submitting a single one of the many concrete pieces of evidence that I had instructed him to get and submit to the court. He only once came to prison, and that was after the disclosure deadline had passed, in order to tell me that he could not continue with the case! He claimed he could not continue with my case due to multiple tragedies in his family and that no one else in his firm was available. I was in prison! Trial was a few short weeks away! No evidence was thus offered on my behalf! I tried to adjourn but the DJ at Uxbridge Magistrates court said 'this poor woman has been waiting for two hours for the court to start', as a man on remand for two months, innocent until proven guilty, did not concern them in the least. As a result, the court said that I was legally represented (a new firm now) and had had ample opportunity to submit evidence. Obviously that was not true. In effect, being in prison on remand, I was utterly dependent upon Ahmed and Co. doing that most basic of requirements and giving the court the evidence of my innocence. He didn't. There was not enough time left before trial. The judge, in the absence of any of my evidence, found against me. I complained to him. He tries to make me appear to be in the wrong, with a thesis, all of which avoids the main point: I was found guilty, quite incorrectly, as a result of his neglect. You might want to consider the above while making a decision, re. which firm to choose!
Solicitors tagged in
this review
Learn if this solicitor can assist you
Discover the right legal expertise tailored to your needs. Assess availability, delve into specialised knowledge, and understand costs transparently.
Our platform, dedicated to collecting solicitor reviews, ranks them based on value, quality, and ethical standards, guiding you to informed decisions.
See availability
Check expertise
Estimate Costs
