02039729011
Excellent does not necessarily mean ‘cheap’. It means that clients thought that the level of service received was Excellent for what they paid.
This score has been calculated using up to the last 300 reviews left by clients of Scott-moncrieff And Associates Limited on ReviewSolicitors.
As part of our review questionnaire we ask reviewer questions about the value for money they felt they received by using Scott-moncrieff And Associates Limited. These questions include:
We use data science to amalgamate the answers to these questions and create a ‘ReviewSolicitors score’ out of 100. The above chart representation score is a simple percentage representation of the averaged score across those who have reviewed this law firm.
If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.
Read moreless...
ReviewSolicitors uses our community data to show you how many clients used Scott-moncrieff And Associates Limited and have had a satisfactory experience where they have indicated that they would recommend the services of the law firm to their friends and family.
You can use this data to see how Scott-moncrieff And Associates Limited performs against other law firms nationally. A score close to 100% indicates that this firm is highly valued by their clients.
As part of our review questionnaire we ask the question:
"Would you recommend this firm to somebody else?"
The reviewer can select either “Yes” or “No”.
The above score is a simple percentage representation of the total amount of clients who selected the “Yes” option:
If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.
Read moreless...
ReviewSolicitors uses our community data to show you how many clients used Scott-moncrieff And Associates Limited and were satisfied with the outcome of their matter. Being satisfied with the outcome of your matter is an important consideration to have in mind.
You can use this data to see how Scott-moncrieff And Associates Limited compares to the national average of clients being satisfied with the outcome of their matter after instructing a solicitor.
As part of our review questionnaire we ask the question:
"Were you satisfied with the outcome of your case?"
The reviewer can select either “Yes” or “No”.
The above score is a simple percentage representation of the total amount of clients who selected the “Yes” option:
If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.
Read moreless...
The rankings below show the areas of expertise that Scott-moncrieff And Associates Limited offers to clients. You can see how good the service offered is in comparison to all other law firms nationally.
Locally
Nationally
Data shown above is based on the reviews and client feedback collected by ReviewSolicitors over the last 12 months.
You may want to discover a firm with an established and proven reputation on ReviewSolicitors
Client Reviews
eliseo
Collected on:
Prakesh Ruparelia was very helpful and knowledgeable with helping my parents with universal credit claim. He was always very approachable and dedicated surrounded by a friendly and professional team. I would definitely recommend his services to others.
Was this review helpful?
Louise
Collected on:
I consulted with Prakash regarding a potential issue I had with DWP due to creating a trust fund to hold monies from a house sale for my severely mentally ill sister. I was very concerned about how DWP would view these funds in relation to my sister’s benefits and if they would consider it ‘deprivation of capital’.
From the beginning it was clear that Prakash knows the DWP rules and regulations around benefits inside out and that he knows what will be considered when a case is looked into.
He gave me excellent advice on how to create an argument against any challenge from DWP and what to consider when putting my points across. His written and verbal skills are exceptional, having a very clear and logical style, he is able to impart information in a very professional but digestible way.
His written advice gave me such good content and pointers on how to word my evidence. Once DWP reviewed this evidence, they agreed that the Trust Fund was absolutely necessary and there was no attempt at deprivation of capital. I feel that Prakash was a big part of gaining this good outcome.
In addition, when I was stressed, Prakash’s calm way of talking and explaining things reassured me and reduced my anxiety.
I highly recommend Prakash for any Benefits issues you may have and he will always be the first person I go to for any further issues in future as he’s an excellent person to have on your side.
Was this review helpful?
Iain
Collected on:
Sorted the wheat from the chaff gave advice as requested. Representation in court as requested. Could have been clearer about the representation in court i.e. what was covered in the original price quoted. But all good! 😊
Was this review helpful?
J
Collected on:
Brilliant, brilliant Prakash Ruparelia! Verry supportive, knowledgeable, and kind towards a client with multiple severe disabilities.
And they won my case!
Absolute value for money! Highly recommended.
Was this review helpful?
mariek
Collected on:
The title of this review refers to the skills and diligence of Terence Channer. After receiving abysmal service and lack of representation from our previous solicitors, Mr Channer literally rescued our situation from what was certain to be a negative outcome. Proving to be professional, knowledgeable and very experienced he provided us with excellent council.
Was this review helpful?
Lorna
Collected on:
This review is for a different branch.
Wonderful team that I would heartily recommend.
Open communication from the outset and a caring and professional service to the end.
I will be suggesting this team to anyone I encounter that may need their services.
Thanks again!
Was this review helpful?
Sam
Collected on:
This review is for a different branch.
I can highly recommend Prakash Ruparelia for representation for PIP Tribunals.
After months of back and forth between myself and the DWP with 2 mandatory reconsideration/appeals declined and support from PIP refused I decided to find a solicitor to help me.
How glad am I that I found Prakash. After nearly 2 years of fighting the DWP I finally won at tribunal and was awarded PIP. After another 5 weeks I have been paid my back pay. Without Prakash I would not have won this. He was also very kind and understanding when I was having pain flares and also when my mental health was suffering due to all of the stress that this caused me. Do not give in if you are genuinely in need of support or benefits get a solicitor and keep going right to the end. It has paid off for me. Thank you so much Prakash, I appreciate your help and support.
Was this review helpful?
Asha
Collected on:
This review is for a different branch.
Prakash Ruparelia was extremely knowledgeable about my benefits issue, where other firms had not been able to help me. He was communicative and reassuring, and provided sound advice that helped me to avoid issues further down the line. I would recommend his services.
Was this review helpful?
Matter Type:
Pension and property advice
Elisabeth
Collected on:
This review is for a different branch.
'I highly recommend Prakash Ruparelia from Scott-Moncrieff & Associates. He helped my mother to find a prompt and cost-effective way of resolving her case. At each stage of legal process Prakash gave clear and concise advice and provided an honest appraisal about the merits of our case. This helped us to make informed decisions about what steps to take. Always calm and well-prepared, Prakash worked tirelessly to achieve a brilliant result for us.'
Was this review helpful?
Mussarat
Collected on:
This review is for a different branch.
I was very fortunate to have found Prakash Ruparelia to help me. I was going through a bad time physically and mentally to deal with my claim.he made the process so easy and efficient. He is a very honest and professional at what he does .
I’m very appreciative of his help.
Was this review helpful?
