Andrew Morris

Senior Associate

Accepting new clients via ReviewSolicitors

Andrew is a highly regarded criminal advocate with extensive experience in representing defendants charged with serious offences in the Crown Court and Court of Appeal. Andrew is regularly instructed in terrorism cases and has appeared as a junior alone and leading junior in such cases. He has successfully defended a client in a multi handed terrorism trial in which the main defendant was found guilty of preparatory terrorist acts and in a case involving national security in which a defendant was acquitted of dissemination of terrorist material. He has acted as junior alone in the Court of Appeal in the recent cases of AA [2019] EWCA Crim 1307 and Grimwood [2021] EWCA Crim 8 where multiple convictions for historic offences were overturned as a result of errors in summing up and wrongly admitted bad character evidence. He has also acted as junior alone in HNF[2022] EWCA Crim 859 in which a conviction for being concerned in the supply of class a drugs was quashed on the grounds that the Jury had been misdirected on an element of the defence of Modern Slavery under s45(4) Modern Slavery Act 2015 as it relates to persons under the age of 18. He has also appeared before the Divisional Court in a leading case stated appeal on police powers of arrest Ali v DPP [2009] EWHC 3353 (Admin) in which the Court quashed convictions on the grounds of errors of law. In 2013 he was led junior in a landmark case of R-v- G [2012] EWCA Crim 1756 in which convictions were overturned and which is now a leading case on the law on half time submissions in the Crown Court. In R-v- DA [2022] Andrew appeared as junior alone at the Central Criminal Court where he was successful in a half time submission on a charge of manslaughter and achieved not guilty verdict for an offence of assisting an offender. Andrew is also instructed in cases of alleged misuse of police powers of arrest and detention and recently in R-v- KD [2022] where he was successful in a trial where the issues concerned the misuse of police powers of stop and search under S23 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, reasonable force and the freedom of expression under Article 10 of European Convention of Human Rights. Andrew is a media contributor and an advocacy trainer for the Law Society. He has written journal articles on the issue of disclosure in the Crown Courts and also regularly trains advocates in cross examination of vulnerable witnesses. He has been a member of the Law Society Advocacy Advisory committee for a number of years and participated in advocacy round tables and media appearances.

  • Regulated by: The Solicitors Regulation Authority

  • Regulator ID: 354771

  • Based in London
  • Licensed for 20 years

Accepting new clients via ReviewSolicitors

Andrew is a highly regarded criminal advocate with extensive experience in representing defendants charged with serious offences in the Crown Court and Court of Appeal. Andrew is regularly instructed in terrorism cases and has appeared as a junior alone and leading junior in such cases. He has successfully defended a client in a multi handed terrorism trial in which the main defendant was found guilty of preparatory terrorist acts and in a case involving national security in which a defendant was acquitted of dissemination of terrorist material. He has acted as junior alone in the Court of Appeal in the recent cases of AA [2019] EWCA Crim 1307 and Grimwood [2021] EWCA Crim 8 where multiple convictions for historic offences were overturned as a result of errors in summing up and wrongly admitted bad character evidence. He has also acted as junior alone in HNF[2022] EWCA Crim 859 in which a conviction for being concerned in the supply of class a drugs was quashed on the grounds that the Jury had been misdirected on an element of the defence of Modern Slavery under s45(4) Modern Slavery Act 2015 as it relates to persons under the age of 18. He has also appeared before the Divisional Court in a leading case stated appeal on police powers of arrest Ali v DPP [2009] EWHC 3353 (Admin) in which the Court quashed convictions on the grounds of errors of law. In 2013 he was led junior in a landmark case of R-v- G [2012] EWCA Crim 1756 in which convictions were overturned and which is now a leading case on the law on half time submissions in the Crown Court. In R-v- DA [2022] Andrew appeared as junior alone at the Central Criminal Court where he was successful in a half time submission on a charge of manslaughter and achieved not guilty verdict for an offence of assisting an offender. Andrew is also instructed in cases of alleged misuse of police powers of arrest and detention and recently in R-v- KD [2022] where he was successful in a trial where the issues concerned the misuse of police powers of stop and search under S23 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, reasonable force and the freedom of expression under Article 10 of European Convention of Human Rights. Andrew is a media contributor and an advocacy trainer for the Law Society. He has written journal articles on the issue of disclosure in the Crown Courts and also regularly trains advocates in cross examination of vulnerable witnesses. He has been a member of the Law Society Advocacy Advisory committee for a number of years and participated in advocacy round tables and media appearances.

  • Regulated by: The Solicitors Regulation Authority

  • Regulator ID: 354771

  • Based in London
  • Licensed for 20 years

Email
Email
Andrew Morris photo

Andrew Morris

Email

ReviewSolicitors Suitability Check

See availability

Expertise

Costs


Please enter a search query before checking suitability.
Our AI couldn’t identify the legal issue in that search 🤔 Try describing the legal problem in a different way.
5.0
Excellent
95%+
Value for
Money
95%+
Success
Rate
95%+
Would
Recommend
Communication 5.0/5
Initial Impressions 5.0/5
Approachability 5.0/5
Documentation Accuracy 5.0/5
Legal Knowledge 5.0/5
Value for money 5.0/5
Expertise

Experience

  • Irvine Thanvi Natas

    Employee

    Until Present

Languages spoken

  • English
  • French

Opening hours

Monday 09:00–17:30
Tuesday 09:00–17:30
Wednesday 09:00–17:30
Thursday 09:00–17:30
Friday 09:00–17:30
Saturday (Closed)
Sunday (Closed)

Portsoken House, 155-157 Minories, London, EC3N 1LJ

Reviews

5.0 /5 3 Reviews
Filter your results
Star rating
Review Source

Rating

Review Source

ReviewSolicitors Review List

Profile image of Ed P

Ed P

Verified
Criminal Law

Very professional, gentle, honest advice, brilliant work

I had a great experience with the firm, with Ms Lucy Ffrench and her colleague Mr Andrew Morris as my solicitors. They explained my situation clearly and honestly, didn't give me any false hope, yet they went above and beyond with their work, showing great degree of creative thinking and knowledge which turned into a successful outcome in court. I would definitely recommend them!

Legal experts tagged in
this review

from Irvine Thanvi Natas

Thank you for your kind feedback, Ed. We’re delighted to hear that Lucy Ffrench and Andrew Morris provided clear, honest advice and supported you so effectively throughout your case. It’s great to know their professionalism, knowledge, and commitment helped achieve a successful outcome in court.

0
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo
Profile image of Anonymous

Anonymous

Crime/ Criminal Defence

Words cannot express the immense relief you have brought upon me.

I wish to express my sincere appreciation to Andrew for his brilliant legal insight and support. Words cannot express the immense relief you have brought upon me.

Solicitors tagged in
this review

0
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo
Profile image of Anonymous

Anonymous

Crime/ Criminal Defence

We are utterly thrilled with the outcome of this case

We are utterly thrilled with the outcome of this case and want to thank you all on helping to successfully bring this case to a close. Andrew was absolutely brilliant - our heartiest thanks for his invaluable integrity, commitment, support and hard work. When K walked out, after a huge hug from me, two members of the jury came up to him, congratulated him, wished him well for the future and made a point of saying that they were all immediately and unanimously in agreement on the Not Guilty verdict. I asked if they were mothers and both were mothers of five! Nevertheless, we feel that there should be a further case against the police for the maltreatment, unnecessary harassment and humiliation, assault, loss of earnings and opportunities caused by this case. This list is not necessarily exhaustive...

Solicitors tagged in
this review

0
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo

Learn if this Solicitor can assist you

Discover the right legal expertise tailored to your needs. Assess availability, delve into specialised knowledge, and understand costs transparently.

Our platform, dedicated to collecting solicitor reviews, ranks them based on value, quality, and ethical standards, guiding you to informed decisions.

See availability
Check expertise
Estimate Costs
Clear