Paul
Brilliant service
Have to say how impressed I was with the service I got from this firm. Nothing was to much trouble and found them very freindly and helpful
Solicitors tagged in
this review
-
Regulated by: The Solicitors Regulation Authority
-
Regulator ID: 402924
-
Based in Birkenhead, Merseyside
-
Licensed for 16 years
Not accepting new clients via ReviewSolicitors
-
Regulated by: The Solicitors Regulation Authority
-
Regulator ID: 402924
-
Based in Birkenhead, Merseyside
-
Licensed for 16 years
Alisha Ann Butler
ReviewSolicitors Suitability Check
See availability
Expertise
Costs
In your own words, tell us what you need help with and we’ll show you how this law firm may be able to assist, based on their experience and client feedback.
Please enter a search query before checking suitability.
Our AI couldn’t identify the legal issue in that search 🤔 Try describing the legal problem in a different way.
Good
Value for
Money
Money
Value for money
About this score
This rating is based on verified client feedback and compares how this firm’s value for money is perceived against the national average. In legal services, value for money is not about being the cheapest option, but about whether clients feel the service, expertise, and outcome justified the cost. This comparison helps place client experiences in context when choosing a law firm.
Success
Rate
Rate
Satisfied with outcome
About this score
This rating is based on client feedback and compares how satisfied people were with the result of their legal matter against the national average for similar legal services. While every case is different and outcomes can depend on the law, the facts, and decisions made by courts or tribunals, this comparison is designed to be like for like.
When a firm has a large number of reviews, individual case differences tend to balance out over time. This makes the national average a useful benchmark for understanding how often clients feel the result achieved was fair and appropriate for their situation. Even small differences from the average can therefore reflect a meaningful difference in the overall standard of legal service provided.
Would
Recommend
Recommend
Would recommend to friends and family
About this score
This score shows how likely clients are to recommend this law firm to friends or family, based on verified reviews and compared with the national average. In legal matters, recommendations are usually based on trust, clarity of advice, and how supported clients felt throughout their case. This comparison helps show how consistently a firm meets those expectations.
Communication
3.0/5
Initial Impressions
3.0/5
Approachability
3.0/5
Documentation Accuracy
3.0/5
Legal Knowledge
3.0/5
Value for money
3.0/5
Expertise
See all 5 practice areasLanguages spoken
- English
Alisha Ann Butler, is this your profile?
Claiming your profile is free and easy! Highlight your professional experience, availability, and contact details. Monitor and respond to new reviews with instant notifications, or report them as needed. Boost your online presence and track profile visits with our analytics.
Claim your profile!50 Argyle Street, Birkenhead, Wirral, Merseyside, CH41 6AF
Reviews
3.0
/5
2 Reviews
Filter your results
Star rating
Rating
ReviewSolicitors Review List
Abde
Very unprofessional company that lets trainees make all the decisions.
The Director of this company(Alisha Ann Butler) is a very offensive person that uses derogatory foul language and emails with Legal threats of defamation against anyone that complains about her company or leaves negative reviews. she has also recently been fined by the SRA see Below. Quote from Legalfutures.co.uk) A solicitor who admitted to a “serious breach” of the accounts rules – in part due to the impact of Covid – has escaped with a rebuke from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). The multiple failures by Alisha Butler, owner and sole director of Birkenhead firm Phoenix Legal could have led to a referral to a disciplinary tribunal but her misconduct was instead resolved through a regulatory settlement agreement between her and the SRA. An investigation triggered by a qualified accountant’s report found that the firm was unable to demonstrate that reconciliations had been carried out at least once every five weeks and had failed to keep and maintain proper and accurate accounting records. Further, there was a shortage on client account of £2,072 as at 31 March 2021, caused by liabilities in six client matters not being shown in the books of account. Ms Butler addressed this by “making the appropriate payments from the office account during the SRA inspection”. In addition, client money had been dealt with through a non-client bank account between September 2017 and October 2020. Ms Butler admitted breaching several accounts rules and SRA principles. Admissions 3.1 Ms Butler makes the following admissions which the SRA accepts: That by failing to keep accounting records properly written up, allowing a client account shortage to occur and dealing with client money through a non-client bank account she has: breached Rules 1.2(b), 1.2(e), 1.2(f), 7.1, 29.1(a) and 29.9 of the SRA Accounts Rules 2011 and Rules 4.1, 6.1, 8.1 and 8.3 of the SRA Accounts Rules 2019; and breached Principles 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 of the SRA Principles 2011 and Principles 2 and 7 of the SRA Principles 2019.
Solicitors tagged in
this review
Learn if this Solicitor can assist you
Discover the right legal expertise tailored to your needs. Assess availability, delve into specialised knowledge, and understand costs transparently.
Our platform, dedicated to collecting solicitor reviews, ranks them based on value, quality, and ethical standards, guiding you to informed decisions.
See availability
Check expertise
Estimate Costs
