Request a callback

Book an appointment

How Medicalnegligence.co.uk Compares

Value for money

This firm - 97%
National Average
Poor Competitive Excellent

Excellent does not necessarily mean ‘cheap’. It means that clients thought that the level of service received was Excellent for what they paid.

This score has been calculated using up to the last 300 reviews left by clients of Medicalnegligence.co.uk on ReviewSolicitors.

As part of our review questionnaire we ask reviewer questions about the value for money they felt they received by using Medicalnegligence.co.uk. These questions include:

  • Value for money (a rating of 1-5)
  • How much were you initially quoted or how much did you expect to pay?
  • Approximately how much did you end up spending for the legal services provided (ignoring disbursements and court fees)
  • Did you think this was underpriced, overpriced or about right?
  • Overall experience

We use data science to amalgamate the answers to these questions and create a ‘ReviewSolicitors score’ out of 100. The above chart representation score is a simple percentage representation of the averaged score across those who have reviewed this law firm.

Underpriced 0%
Overpriced 0%
About Right 100%

If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.

Read moreless...

Would recommend to
friends and family

This firm - 100%
National Average
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ReviewSolicitors uses our community data to show you how many clients used Medicalnegligence.co.uk and have had a satisfactory experience where they have indicated that they would recommend the services of the law firm to their friends and family.

You can use this data to see how Medicalnegligence.co.uk performs against other law firms nationally. A score close to 100% indicates that this firm is highly valued by their clients.

As part of our review questionnaire we ask the question:

"Would you recommend this firm to somebody else?"

The reviewer can select either “Yes” or “No”.

The above score is a simple percentage representation of the total amount of clients who selected the “Yes” option:

Yes 100%
No 0%

If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.

Read moreless...

Satisfied with
outcome of matter

This firm - 92%
National Average
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ReviewSolicitors uses our community data to show you how many clients used Medicalnegligence.co.uk and were satisfied with the outcome of their matter. Being satisfied with the outcome of your matter is an important consideration to have in mind.

You can use this data to see how Medicalnegligence.co.uk compares to the national average of clients being satisfied with the outcome of their matter after instructing a solicitor.

As part of our review questionnaire we ask the question:

"Were you satisfied with the outcome of your case?"

The reviewer can select either “Yes” or “No”.

The above score is a simple percentage representation of the total amount of clients who selected the “Yes” option:

Yes 92%
No 8%

If you would like to read more about how we work with our review data please see our Transparency section.

Read moreless...

Rankings by area of expertise

The rankings below show the areas of expertise that Medicalnegligence.co.uk offers to clients. You can see how good the service offered is in comparison to all other law firms nationally.

Data shown above is based on the reviews and client feedback collected by ReviewSolicitors over the last 12 months.

Review Sources

Client Reviews

4.8/5

Reviews summary

  • Excellent

    11
  • Very Good

    2
  • Average

    0
  • Poor

    0
  • Awful

    0

Overall experience

  • Value For Money
  • Communication
  • Initial Impressions
  • Approachability
  • Documentation Accuracy
  • Legal knowledge
Isaaac

Verified review

This review has been left by a verified client who used Medicalnegligence.co.uk.

Matter Type:

Dental Negligence

Isaaac

April 15, 2024

Report to admin

Collected on:

Just the support I needed.

Fabulous experience with everyone at bridge McFarland Grimsby. Always there at the end of the phone to answer any questions or concerns. Couldn’t recommend enough!

Was this review helpful?

Stacey

Verified review

This review has been left by a verified client who used Medicalnegligence.co.uk.

Matter Type:

Cauda Equina Syndrome Claims

Stacey

April 10, 2024

Report to admin

Collected on:

Medical negligence

I contacted Bridge- Mcfarland in 2017 and within a week they had travelled a very long distance to my house in Kent to meet me.
I had no idea the process was going to be a long road ahead.
This was not the fault of the solicitors from start to finish.
We also hit covid which made the process longer, however with a great end result this took 6 and a half years.
Over the years I have spent many of hours on phone call's and teams meetings.
All staff had a friendly approach, gave clear advice and helped me when I am not savvy on the laptop, nothing was too much.
All the staff are very professional to a high standard, nothing is too much for them they go above and beyond to make sure their clients are well looked after.
I was given the best service and could not be any happier with having Bridge-Mcfarland to represent me.
I have to say it's going to be some what strange for our contact to come to an end.

I just want to say a huge Thank you for the hard work and determination every staff member has put in to making sure I had the outcome I so rightly deserved.
Chris and Ian you are both super stars Thank you in not enough for what you have achieved a first class service delivered.
Best wishes and kind regards.

Was this review helpful?

?

Verified review

This review has been left by a verified client who used Medicalnegligence.co.uk.

Matter Type:

Clinical Negligence

?

February 21, 2024

Report to admin

Collected on:

Claim for medical negligence

All concluded satisfactorily in a friendly and efficiently manner.

Was this review helpful?

Danielle

Verified review

This review has been left by a verified client who used Medicalnegligence.co.uk.

Matter Type:

Medical Negligence

Danielle

February 14, 2024

Report to admin

Collected on:

Great experience, great result!

Would highly recommend, in depth legal knowledge, kept in the loop and a great result!

Was this review helpful?

Michael William( Bill) Leeming

Verified review

This review has been left by a verified client who used Medicalnegligence.co.uk.

Matter Type:

Medical Negligence

Michael William( Bill) Leeming

February 14, 2024

Report to admin

Collected on:

Clinical negligence

Very satisfied with overall competence.

Was this review helpful?

Jennifer

Matter Type:

Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims

Jennifer

January 16, 2024

Report to admin

Collected on:

Helpful and experienced solicitors

Extremely helpful and professional and always kept me fully informed of all the information I required and requested. Explained everything in a language I could understand. Very pleasant on the phone and in their emails.

Was this review helpful?

Bernard

Matter Type:

Medical Negligence

Bernard

October 31, 2023

Report to admin

Collected on:

A Dependable and Competent Professional

The perfect background and experience to handle Clinical Negligence Claims.

Was this review helpful?

Mel

Matter Type:

Clinical Negligence

Mel

October 24, 2023

Report to admin

Collected on:

Understanding & Professional

Staci worked on my case in a very kind, caring and understanding manner. Proficient and professional throughout. Communication was excellent - updating at every step of the way. Many thanks.

Was this review helpful?

Sarah

Verified review

This review has been left by a verified client who used Medicalnegligence.co.uk.

Matter Type:

Dental Negligence

Sarah

October 21, 2023

Report to admin

Collected on:

Dental claim

I can not fault Chris and his team. They did their very best for me. Always kept me up to date with how my claim was going. I can not fault them.

Was this review helpful?

Karen

Verified review

This review has been left by a verified client who used Medicalnegligence.co.uk.

Matter Type:

Medical Negligence

Karen

October 13, 2023

Report to admin

Collected on:

Its time for closure

These solicitors are very professional. Very committed in what they do, and guided me throughout the whole time it has taken from start to finish. I can highly recommend them. Thanks for all you have done. Really appreciate it.

Was this review helpful?

Medicalnegligence.co.uk are accredited by

accreditation
accreditation
accreditation

About this branch

Description

MedicalNegligence.co.uk is owned and hosted by Bridge McFarland LLP. Bridge McFarland LLP are a nationally recognised law firm with a strong reputation for advising individuals, families and business, professional services, and agricultural and rural organisations on every aspect of the law across many legal disciplines, wherever the need arises. All lawyers are specialists in their specific areas of law and have the expertise to provide you with a quality service tailored to meet your needs, whatever your objectives. Throughout the duration of your medical negligence claim our Medical Injury specialists will work closely with other lawyers should you require expert advice and guidance on other legal services (connected or unconnected to your claim). As part of your claim you may need advice in relation to a Personal Injury trust, drafting or updating a will or putting in place a Lasting Power of Attorney. You may also require a Professional Deputy to manage your compensation. Whatever your needs – there is likely to be someone who can help!

Regulated by

Solicitors Regulation Authority

Legal services

Personal areas of law

  • Clinical Negligence
    • Accident and Emergency Claims
    • Amputation Negligence Claims
    • Anaesthetic Awareness Claims
    • Birth Defect and Wrongful Birth Claims
    • Birth Injury Claims
    • Birth Injury To Mother Claims
    • Blood Transfusion Claims
    • Bowel Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Breast Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Breast Surgery Compensation Claims
    • C. Difficile Claims
    • Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Cauda Equina Syndrome Claims
    • Cerebral Palsy Claims
    • Cervical Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Clinical Negligence
    • Cochlear Implant Claims
    • Cosmetic Dentistry Claims
    • Cosmetic Surgery Claims
    • Defective Medical Device Claims
    • Dental Negligence
    • Dental Negligence Claims
    • Dermal Filler Compensation Claims
    • Diabetes Claims
    • Erb’s Palsy Compensation Claims
    • Eye Surgery Claims
    • Failed Sterilisation Claims
    • Fatal Medical Negligence Claims and Inquests
    • Faulty Defibrillator Claims
    • Fertility Negligence Claims
    • GP Negligence Claims
    • Group B Streptococcus Claims
    • Hospital Negligence Claims
    • Knee Replacement Claims
    • Laser Eye Surgery Claims
    • Laser Treatment Claims
    • Lung Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • MRSA Claims
    • Medical Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Medical Negligence
    • Meningitis Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Metal-On-Metal Hip Replacement Claims
    • Misdiagnosed Miscarriage Claims
    • Nerve Damage Claims
    • Nerve Injury Claims
    • Ophthalmic Negligence Claims
    • Oral Cancer Claims
    • Orthopaedic Negligence Claims
    • Ovarian Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Pancreatic Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Periodontal Disease Claims
    • Pregnancy and Gynaecology Injury Claims
    • Pressure Sore Claims
    • Prostate Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Restorative Dentistry Claims
    • Sepsis Negligence Claims
    • Skin Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Sorin Stockert 3T Heater-Cooler Claims
    • Spinal Surgery Claims
    • Stillbirth Compensation Claims
    • Stroke Misdiagnosis Claims
    • Surgery Compensation Claims
    • Surgical and Transvaginal Mesh Claims
    • Testicular Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims