kayode
My son was arrested, we got bail and await a good result for all his cases
Mr Mohammed zeb and kibla are always there for me
As are the team
A representative from Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd responded to this review on 11 April, 2025
Dear Kayode, Thank you for your kind words and for placing your trust in our team during such a difficult time. Please know that we remain fully committed to achieving the best possible outcome for your son and will continue to stand by you every step of the way. If you ever have any questions or need further assistance, don’t hesitate to reach out. Stuart Miller Solicitors' Team
Was this review helpful? Yes
Review for Mohammed
Mohammed was extremely Helpful and Professional during the entire Process of getting my Court case Together. Would Recommend him Highly.
Lawyer named in this review: Mohammed Zeb
A representative from Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd responded to this review on 10 February, 2025
Hi Connor. Thank you for your kind words! We're pleased to hear that Mohammed provided helpful and professional support throughout your case. Your recommendation means a lot to us!
Was this review helpful? Yes
Professional & accommodating
Efficient and tailored service to accommodate your needs. Great to have solicitors with very good attention to detail. Direct contact with solicitors always with rapid replies
Lawyer named in this review: Mohammed Zeb
A representative from Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd responded to this review on 07 February, 2025
Thank you for your positive feedback, Raheem. We're glad you appreciated our tailored service and attention to detail. It's great to hear that direct contact and prompt replies made a difference for you.
Was this review helpful? Yes
Review Of My Experience Facing A Very Serious & Allegation
Review of My Legal Experience with Stuart Miller Solicitors
From the beginning, my case was complex and unlike any I’d ever encountered. As a professional adult content creator, I faced arrest following a allegation in September 2021, based on what’s known as “conditional consent.” The situation was unique and convoluted: while filming consensual content with a female escort, a misunderstanding over consent conditions—specifically regarding —turned an accident into a serious legal issue.
From the outset, I was transparent with the police, voluntarily sharing messages, photos, and video evidence from the incident. But given my past experience with the justice system, I was deeply apprehensive. Initially, I was represented by Anne Hepburn but as the case grew more challenging I decided to switch firms and contacted Stuart Miller Solicitors, a decision that proved invaluable as the complexities of my case unfolded.
Upon contacting Stuart Miller, I reconnected with Mr. Mohammed Zeb. He immediately remembered me, having represented me as a teenager over a decade ago, and his genuine support was crucial from the start. He quickly connected me with an exceptional solicitor, Victoria Hadjihanna, whose meticulous attention to detail, compassion, genuine care, commitment and unwavering dedication kept me steady through the most challenging periods. Victoria patiently guided me, always explaining each legal step, the arguments we would be using, and the broader significance of those points. This foundation was critical as my case moved toward trial.
When my case finally went to trial in September 2024, my barrister, Margia Mostafah, brought a depth of expertise and poise that transformed the trajectory of the case. Given that my defense centered around proving the accidental nature of the incident and undermining the notion of conditional consent, Margia’s approach to cross-examination was essential.
Key Steps in Cross-Examination and Case Strategy
Margia’s cross-examination carefully addressed each point raised by the complainant, aiming to reveal contradictions in her testimony without attacking her character—a fine line, given the sensitive issues at hand. She opened by confirming that the complainant was a professional worker and asked, “Is your main concern money?” to which the complainant replied, “My main concern is my safety.” This opened a crucial line of questioning: the complainant claimed she only offered protected to ensure safety and prevent infections. However, as Margia pointed out, the complainant’s online profile included an “OWO” ( without) service. This was a pivotal moment, as Margia subtly illustrated the contradiction without directly challenging the complainant’s character. If safety was her top priority, her offering of unprotected services was difficult to reconcile.
In further questioning, Margia turned to another key statement: during the encounter, the complainant stated, “ is acid; it messes up your pH balance.” This was not only scientifically inaccurate— is alkaline, not acidic—but also added to the contradiction regarding the complainant’s expressed concerns about safety and infection. When asked why she made this comment, the complainant avoided answering directly, further undermining her credibility without a character attack. By asking pointed, relevant questions, Margia built a foundation that cast doubt on the complainant’s claims without appearing aggressive.
Legal Issues: Conditional Consent and Character References
The central legal question revolved around the concept of “conditional consent.” The complainant alleged that she had set boundaries around , which I had supposedly violated intentionally. However, as we consistently maintained, there was no such agreement; any assumptions around contraception were based on the professional context and prior discussions. Victoria and Margia worked tirelessly to frame this as a performance error rather than a deliberate act, making the case that the accidental nature of the pre- negated the argument for conditional consent violation.
When the prosecution attempted to introduce a previous conviction to imply a propensity for such actions, Margia and Victoria argued that, given the case’s complexity, allowing this would likely bias the jury against me unfairly. The judge ultimately agreed, ruling that the focus should remain on the specific evidence presented in this case, which was a significant win.
Another potential pitfall arose concerning an altered STI document. Though unrelated to the specifics of consent, the prosecution argued that the document represented a form of deception, which might influence consent. However, Margia argued that, according to Section 76, a deception has to relate to the “nature or purpose” of the act to nullify consent. Since the altered document didn’t pertain directly to the nature of the act itself, the judge ultimately ruled that it should be excluded from consideration as grounds for vitiating consent.
A Crucial Moment: Addressing the Complainant’s Gender Identity
One particularly sensitive issue involved the complainant’s gender identity. Partway through the case, I learned that the complainant was a transgender woman—a fact unknown to me at the time of the incident. For me, as a heterosexual man, this information was deeply impactful and made me feel deceived, as it influenced my ability to make an informed choice. Although I wanted this to be addressed in court, Victoria and Margia advised a cautious approach to avoid appearing as though we were questioning the complainant’s character or identity, which might invite the court to admit prior convictions as a “bad character” reference.
Instead, Margia found a nuanced way to weave this element into her cross-examination by focusing on the complainant’s comments about pH balance. She framed her questions to subtly hint at a discrepancy between biological and neo-vaginal anatomy without directly referencing transgender status, and the judge allowed the question to stand. This skillful strategy allowed us to highlight the specific concerns around health and safety, indirectly making the jury aware of the issue without explicitly stating it. This, in turn, strengthened the argument that the complainant’s reaction may have stemmed from factors unrelated to any prior agreements.
Verdict and Closing Reflections
After the evidence and cross-examinations were presented, the prosecution attempted to paint my actions as part of a larger, intentional scheme to deceive the complainant—an argument the jury found unconvincing. The judge provided clear instructions to focus on the specific evidence, and after approximately 6 hours of deliberation, the jury returned a unanimous “Not Guilty” verdict. This outcome not only restored my faith in the justice system but was also a testament to the incredible work of my legal team.
Final Thanks
I owe my deepest thanks to Margia Mostafah, whose expertise in cross-examination and dedication in court left an indelible mark on the case, thank you for her paitience and understanding, especially with me being an extremely hostile and standoffish client to work with, she is an EXTREMELY professional and competent barrister ; to Victoria Hadjihanna, whose patience, commitment, and attention to detail provided a steadfast foundation throughout, a truly dedicated and compassionate solicitor, she showed me true paitience, was attentive to detail, went above and beyond by attending trial on a legal aid budget, gave me guidance, showed a genuine care for the client, not just as a client but as a human being, Without her there would be no victory, She helped me to understand every step of the procedure even if i didnt agree with things or we clashed, she never gave up on me and was determined to win from the beggining, i owe everything to her; and to Mr. Mohammed Zeb, who saw potential in my case and reassured me through the firm’s support. Transferring my case to Stuart Miller Solicitors was the wisest decision I made, and without their expertise, I might not be here today. He took my case because he genuinely wanted to help and believed he could help, He restored my belief in fighting a battle i felt was lost. Transferring this case to his firm was the wisest move i ever made and without Zebs good memory, and charismatic nature aswel as the drive to take on and overcome huge obstacles and challenges Id have not been able to be here writing this, I highly recommend Stuart Miller Solicitors to anyone in need of defense—they are truly committed to justice.
Lawyer named in this review: Mohammed Zeb
A representative from Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd responded to this review on 04 November, 2024
Thank you for taking the time to share your extensive experience with Stuart Miller Solicitors. We are thrilled to hear that Mohammed, Victoria, and Margia provided you with the support and expertise necessary to navigate your complex case. We strive to ensure that every individual feels informed and supported throughout their legal journey, and it's rewarding to know that our efforts made a positive impact on your experience. We appreciate your trust in us and your recommendation of our services. If you ever need assistance in the future or have any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out. Thank you once again for your kind words.
Was this review helpful? Yes
Great Service
We contacted Stuart Miller Solicitors when my son was faced with very serious charges.
I would like to commend this firm particularly Mohammed Zeb who offered so much support from the onset.
It was a very difficult ?& stressful time but we received reassurance confidence and honesty.
I found this firm to be reliable and always received response back when contact was made even after sentencing was passed we still recieved support with any ongoing queries.
A big thankyou to this firm & would definitely recommend to others.
Lawyer named in this review: Mohammed Zeb
A representative from Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd responded to this review on 23 August, 2024
Dear Jacqueline, Thank you for your kind words. We're pleased to hear that Mohammed and our team were able to support and reassure you during such a challenging time. We appreciate your recommendation. Best regards, Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd
Was this review helpful? Yes
Awesome Lawyer with Tonnes of Experience
Brilliant seasoned veteran legal professional with true care and empathy at his heart and core.
Lawyer named in this review: Mohammed Zeb
A representative from Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd responded to this review on 19 August, 2024
Dear Majicc, Thank you for your thoughtful and generous review. We’re delighted to hear that you found Mohammed to be both experienced and empathetic. Providing care and understanding is at the heart of what we do, and it’s rewarding to know that this made a difference in your experience.
Was this review helpful? Yes
Best solicitor ever in uk 🇬🇧
Just brilliant, hard working and so much give to clients and he understands u so easy… amazing personality so much to learn from
Lawyer named in this review: Mohammed Zeb
A representative from Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd responded to this review on 19 August, 2024
Dear Feroz, Thank you for your wonderful feedback! We're delighted to hear that you had such a positive experience with Mohammed. Best regards, Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd
Was this review helpful? Yes
Best solicitor ever in all Uk 🇬🇧
Just brilliant.. friendly and they understand u so easy… great work and spending so much time for clients
Lawyer named in this review: Mohammed Zeb
A representative from Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd responded to this review on 19 August, 2024
Dear Feroz, Thank you for your kind words. We’re delighted to hear that you found Mohammed and our team friendly and attentive. Your satisfaction is important to us, and we appreciate your recognition of our commitment to clients.
Was this review helpful? Yes
The best ever
They have fight till last minute for my case… amazing
Lawyer named in this review: Mohammed Zeb
A representative from Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd responded to this review on 19 August, 2024
Dear Feroz, Thank you for your feedback! We’re glad that Mohammed and our team fought hard for your case and achieved the results you needed. Best regards, Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd
Was this review helpful? Yes
Alam khan
Really good service fully recommend good advice save me a lot of headache
Lawyer named in this review: Mohammed Zeb
A representative from Stuart Miller Solicitors Ltd responded to this review on 16 August, 2024
Thank you, Alam, for your positive feedback. We’re pleased to hear that Mohammed's advice helped alleviate your concerns. Your recommendation means a lot to us!
Was this review helpful? Yes
Crime Department
Retained advice and representation from Mr Mohammed Zeb.
His service and advice was excellent. Very courteous and understanding of our situation.
Put our minds at rest in a very stressful situation as we had never been in a court before.
Lawyer named in this review: Mohammed Zeb
A representative from Blackfriars Law Limited responded to this review on 29 January, 2025
Thank you for your review. We appreciate the positive feedback you have given us and look forward to working with you in the future.
Was this review helpful? Yes