*I strongly advise against working with this company.** Initially, I intended to apply for humanitarian protection, which was listed on their website for £750. However, during further discussions, they convinced me that applying for asylum and humanitarian protection were different things—claiming that the asylum service cost significantly more and that my chances of success were higher. After speaking with Mr. Amir I. Naviwala, I decided to pay £2,000 for the asylum application. The payment was processed, and we began compiling my case.
They prepared a one-page document with my biography and considered their job done. I received no advice on the strengths or weaknesses of my case, no supporting documents from any organizations to substantiate my claims, and no expert report regarding conditions in my home country for the court.
I’m not saying they failed to handle the technical aspects—like filling out a few court forms—they did that. But that’s where their merits end. Right before the crucial second interview (which determines the outcome of the case), they suddenly advised me to withdraw my application, citing recent changes in Home Office rules. They knew about these changes before filing but hid them to secure their fee.
During information gathering, they incorrectly claimed my visa had expired (which would give the Home Office grounds to reject me). I had to correct them—my visa is valid until 2026. To clarify: When I first asked about applying for humanitarian protection, they pushed me toward asylum, insisting my chances were better. Now, they’re telling me, "Sorry, your visa reduces your chances—we can’t win this."
A day before the interview, we did a mock session. Mid-consultation, they abruptly said, "You have no chance. Here’s Plan B: become a chef (so you can earn more), let us set up a work visa scheme for you, or marry a British citizen." This was Sunrise Solicitors’ "solution." Sensing my frustration, they offered a £1,000 coupon for future services.
I believe I was misled with empty promises. When it came time for the interview, they tried to evade responsibility by declaring our case "already lost