Maitland Walker LLP

Having used Kirsty before for the recent purchase of our own property. Once probate was approved for my late father’s estate, we had no second choice in going with anybody else but Kirsty. As it was a rental flat we knew hardly anything about. Kirsty was very understanding of the situation and negotiated all the complexities of the sale extremely well. We still have my parents bungalow and two more flats still to sell, which we will certainly be using Kirsty again.

Solicitors tagged in
this review

Kirsty Trevis

I used Maitland Walker for the sale of my late mum’s bungalow and the purchase of my house. They were so helpful and made the whole process stress free. Would definitely use them again.

Legal experts tagged in
this review

Alex Griffin

My experience with Maitland Walker was disappointing. They were perfectly fine from a speed and administrative point of view, and I expect that for a straightforward property purchase they may well be efficient. My concern was what happened when our purchase involved issues that, in my view, required more careful consideration. There were two covenants affecting the property that were particularly important to us: one relating to alterations or extending the property, and another relevant to using the property as an Airbnb/short-term let. Neither was specifically brought to my attention or explained to me as an issue of particular significance. The covenants did appear on page 4 of a standard report, so I am not suggesting they were completely omitted from the paperwork. My complaint is that their significance was not highlighted. By contrast, relatively minor matters, such as the boiler not having been serviced, were specifically drawn to my attention by email. I also found that I repeatedly had to chase for answers once I identified the issues myself. In particular, I raised the possibility of indemnity insurance several times before receiving a substantive response about it. I was therefore frustrated when the subsequent complaint response placed considerable emphasis on the availability of insurance, because this did not address my underlying concern: why the relevant restrictions had not been properly highlighted and explained to me in the first place. I was also very unhappy with the way my complaint was handled by Julian Maitland Walker. Before he responded substantively, I emailed to check that he understood what I was complaining about and offered to set out the issues in more detail if that would help. I was told that the complaint was understood. However, the eventual response did not, in my view, address the central point I had been making. That left me feeling that I had not been listened to and that the response concentrated on points that were easier to answer rather than the substance of my complaint. Whatever the reason for that, I found the approach dismissive and frustrating. I was also unhappy to receive correspondence concerning additional fees if payment was not made within 14 days while my complaint remained ongoing. In the circumstances, I found that unnecessarily heavy-handed. Overall, my experience was that Maitland Walker were efficient at processing the transaction, but I was not satisfied with the level of attention given to issues that were fundamental to how we intended to use the property, nor with the subsequent handling of my complaint. Based on my experience, I would not use the firm again

Anna Jane Louisa Neil

28/09/2026

Thank you for your feedback. We are sorry to see that you feel you had a negative experience with your aborted purchase. We note that this concerned two covenants which would have limited your ability to extend the property as you may have wished or to use it for short term letting. Ultimately, you chose not to proceed with the purchase. The two covenants to which you refer are fairly common. We issue a Report on Title to clients which brings to their attention search results, relevant matters regarding the property and the purchase / sales contract. It is inevitably a long document but one which clients are advised to read fully and carefully. In your case, the two covenants in question were identified and explained in your report on title. You feel that the report did not sufficiently highlight these covenants which were significant to you and instead you feel that issues which you consider less important - such as boiler servicing, were indicated more clearly. For accuracy, the issue with the boiler service was not raised by email but within the Report on Title. We asked the sellers to address the issue in our 'questions to the sellers' a copy of which was sent to you at your request. It is also important to note that at the stage that your Report on Title was issued, you had not advised us that you intended to use the property for short term letting and as such there was no reason for us to have suspected that this covenant posed a particular issue for you. In the event, having read the report you drew our attention to the difficulty caused by the covenants and advised us of your plans for the property. We advised you that a potential solution was to obtain a bespoke indemnity insurance policy a quote for which we obtained and provided to you but ultimately you did not wish to proceed. In the event, despite the potential solution, you decided not to proceed with the purchase. We are also sorry that you do not feel your complaint was dealt with as you would have wished after your file was carefully reviewed by Mr Maitland Walker. In the interests of accuracy and in relation to costs there were 'additional' fees indicated or charged - rather we offered to limit fees to half the fee quote for the aborted matter, despite time fees recorded being substantially higher. We always aim to be as fair and flexible with clients as we can, however, as matters continued to be protracted, this reduced fee became less tenable and your attention was drawn to this. In the event, you were invoiced only half the fee quote which we are grateful to you for settling promptly.

The sale of our property was handled efficiently. Kirsty was contactable and replied to queries promptly and thoroughly.

Solicitors tagged in
this review

Kirsty Trevis

Very good service, very professional. Also quick to respond and answer every question promptly. Alex dealt with 3 houses for us at the same time and the process was very smooth. Will definitely use Alex again. Thank you.

Legal experts tagged in
this review

Alex Griffin

Katie thank you for your kindness also courtesy expertise in guiding me through drafting my Will and lasting power of attorney your professional and understanding approach it truly put me at ease a sensitive process so much that my whole family have now moved over to your company, thank you again for your time and support David. 😊

You have a fairly rude and unhelpful receptionist - uninterested in acquiring new business for your firm - literally put a phone down on me.

Trying to find Solsisters as a first time buyer so new to all this , and the reception lady was very very rude and snobby! Don’t go with these people!!

After 2 failed purchase attempts, we finally completed on our first home in January - all thanks to Faith & Katie at Maitland Walker. We never had to wait more than a day for a response, they were proactive, concise & detailed with information, chasing the sellers without prompting, helped us decide when to pull out of the other houses (both times issues on the seller’s & property side) and moved us from offer to completion on our new home in 3 months - even with Christmas & New Years in between. After hearing so many horror stories about solicitors & home buying, we couldn’t have been any happier than having Faith on our side!

Alex Griffin was brilliant kept me informed all the way and was very helpful and professional!