Hugh James logo

Hugh James

4.3 | 28 Reviews 28 Reviews | Objects Causing Injuries
151 Total Company Reviews info icon Objects Causing Injuries | info icon 151 Total Company Reviews Objects Causing Injuries | info icon 151 Total Company Reviews

Two Central Square, Central Square, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, CF10 1FS

Accepting new clients

Two Central Square, Central Square, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, CF10 1FS

Regulated by:

The Solicitors Regulation Authority

Regulator ID: 303202

ReviewSolicitors Suitability Check

See availability

Expertise

Costs


Please enter a search query before checking suitability.
Our AI couldn’t identify the legal issue in that search 🤔 Try describing the legal problem in a different way.

Hugh James only have 151 reviews listed.

More Top-Rated and highly recommended law firms:

You may want to discover a firm with an established and proven reputation on ReviewSolicitors

Hugh James Review Scores & Client Satisfaction Overview

4.3
Excellent
86%
Value for
Money
82%
Success
Rate
82%
Would
Recommend
Communication 4.4/5
Initial Impressions 4.4/5
Approachability 4.3/5
Documentation Accuracy 4.3/5
Legal Knowledge 4.4/5
Value for money 4.3/5

Accreditations

Hugh James are accredited by

Children Law accreditation awarded to Hugh James
Criminal Litigation accreditation awarded to Hugh James
Personal Injury accreditation awarded to Hugh James
Trading names:
Hugh James Independent Financial Advisers

Description

We're Hugh James. A top 100 UK law firm offering a full range of legal services. With more than 60 years’ experience and 560 staff members, we have the expertise to deliver a service you can trust. We’d love to talk to you about how we can help. Our lawyers will take the time to understand what you want to achieve and will work tirelessly to help achieve the result you want.

Rankings by area of expertise

The rankings below show the areas of expertise that Hugh James offers to clients. You can see how good the service offered is in comparison to all other law firms nationally / locally.

Hugh James Review Scores & Client Satisfaction Overview

2.7
55%
Value for
Money
28% below
national average
44%
Success
Rate
38% below
national average
42%
Would
Recommend
39% below
national average
Communication 2.8/5
Initial Impressions 3.0/5
Approachability 2.8/5
Documentation Accuracy 2.8/5
Legal Knowledge 2.9/5
Value for money 2.8/5

Accreditations

Hugh James are accredited by

Children Law accreditation awarded to Hugh James
Criminal Litigation accreditation awarded to Hugh James
Personal Injury accreditation awarded to Hugh James
Trading names:
Hugh James Independent Financial Advisers

Description

We're Hugh James. A top 100 UK law firm offering a full range of legal services. With more than 60 years’ experience and 560 staff members, we have the expertise to deliver a service you can trust. We’d love to talk to you about how we can help. Our lawyers will take the time to understand what you want to achieve and will work tirelessly to help achieve the result you want.

Rankings by area of expertise

The rankings below show the areas of expertise that Hugh James offers to clients. You can see how good the service offered is in comparison to all other law firms nationally / locally.

Housing & Property 2 / 2
Personal Injury 1 / 4
Family Law 2 / 2
Professional Negligence 1 / 4
Crime/ Criminal Defence 1 / 1
Consumer 1 / 5
Dispute Resolution 1 / 4
Litigation 1 / 1
Immigration Law 1 / 1
Welfare & Benefits 1 / 1
Wills, Trusts & Probate 2 / 2
Clinical Negligence 1 / 4
Child Law 1 / 1
Commercial Property 1 / 5
Education 1 / 1
Asset Management 1 / 2
Care Law 1 / 3
Charities 1 / 4
Employment 1 / 2
Fraud Law 1 / 1
Inheritance Law 1 / 2
Company Law 1 / 2
Criminal Law 1 / 1
Insurance Law 1 / 1
Land Law 1 / 3
Business Law 1 / 1
Contract Law 1 / 3
Corporate Law 1 / 1
Court of Protection and Deputyship 1 / 3
Driving offences 1 / 1
Equality Law 1 / 3
Governance Law 1 / 35
Health and Welfare Law 1 / 15
Healthcare Law 1 / 1
Inquest Law 1 / 5
Money & Tax 1 / 5
Adjudication Law 1 / 1
Agriculture 1 / 4
Banking 1 / 2
Class Action Law 1 / 2
Company & Commercial 1 / 4
Compliance Law 1 / 1
Construction 1 / 4
Copyright Law 1 / 44
Cybersecurity and Data Protection Law 1 / 1
Debt and Tax Law 1 / 2
Discrimination Law 1 / 2
Domestic Violence Law 1 / 1
Economic Law 1 / 48
Energy & Transport 1 / 86
Energy Law 1 / 41
Entertainment and Media Law 1 / 1
Environmental Law 1 / 48
Fire Safety Law 1 / 1
Food Law 1 / 3
Gambling Law 1 / 1
Government Contracts Law 1 / 5
Hospitality Law 1 / 1
Human rights 1 / 6
IT & Intellectual Property 1 / 4
Immigration 1 / 1
Information Law 1 / 1
Infrastructure Law 1 / 3
Intellectual Property Law 1 / 46
Licensing Law 1 / 1
Mergers and Acquisitions Law 1 / 1
National Insurance Law 1 / 3
Notary 1 / 1
Occupational Health Law 1 / 1
Pensions Law 1 / 30
Pharmaceutical Law 1 / 3
Planning Law 1 / 2
Product Safety Law 1 / 10
Regulations 1 / 4
Regulatory Law 1 / 2
Sports Law 1 / 2
Surveillance Law 1 / 15
Telecommunications Law 1 / 11
Tourism Law 1 / 8
Local 1 / 11
Housing & Property 763 / 4,769
Personal Injury 276 / 2,653
Family Law 720 / 4,221
Professional Negligence 204 / 1,297
Crime/ Criminal Defence 243 / 2,139
Consumer 334 / 4,416
Dispute Resolution 299 / 1,801
Litigation 189 / 878
Immigration Law 142 / 1,147
Welfare & Benefits 132 / 1,049
Wills, Trusts & Probate 566 / 3,761
Clinical Negligence 171 / 1,246
Child Law 338 / 1,638
Commercial Property 509 / 3,667
Education 73 / 424
Asset Management 70 / 392
Care Law 137 / 532
Charities 120 / 770
Employment 487 / 3,621
Fraud Law 92 / 514
Inheritance Law 177 / 676
Company Law 185 / 969
Criminal Law 165 / 1,003
Insurance Law 114 / 663
Land Law 275 / 1,321
Business Law 112 / 459
Contract Law 264 / 1,427
Corporate Law 176 / 842
Court of Protection and Deputyship 171 / 575
Driving offences 137 / 623
Equality Law 219 / 1,097
Governance Law 45 / 273
Health and Welfare Law 44 / 185
Healthcare Law 59 / 356
Inquest Law 11 / 50
Money & Tax 283 / 1,952
Adjudication Law 54 / 238
Agriculture 220 / 819
Banking 114 / 1,031
Class Action Law 7 / 103
Company & Commercial 430 / 4,185
Compliance Law 70 / 461
Construction 146 / 856
Copyright Law 79 / 522
Cybersecurity and Data Protection Law 144 / 894
Debt and Tax Law 160 / 785
Discrimination Law 107 / 496
Domestic Violence Law 208 / 897
Economic Law 17 / 223
Energy & Transport 54 / 511
Energy Law 69 / 359
Entertainment and Media Law 9 / 56
Environmental Law 63 / 393
Fire Safety Law 42 / 180
Food Law 8 / 80
Gambling Law 13 / 75
Government Contracts Law 9 / 132
Hospitality Law 18 / 95
Human rights 80 / 963
IT & Intellectual Property 153 / 1,113
Immigration 238 / 2,281
Information Law 42 / 338
Infrastructure Law 33 / 188
Intellectual Property Law 114 / 623
Licensing Law 91 / 500
Mergers and Acquisitions Law 86 / 425
National Insurance Law 110 / 423
Notary 129 / 843
Occupational Health Law 118 / 428
Pensions Law 104 / 486
Pharmaceutical Law 12 / 95
Planning Law 128 / 585
Product Safety Law 6 / 56
Regulations 208 / 2,413
Regulatory Law 43 / 256
Sports Law 59 / 302
Surveillance Law 38 / 164
Telecommunications Law 6 / 74
Tourism Law 10 / 43
National 538 / 11,165

Contact & Locations - Hugh James

Two Central Square, Central Square, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, CF10 1FS

Reviews

4.3 /5 28 Reviews
Filter your results
Star rating

Rating

ReviewSolicitors Review List

Profile image of Merisan

Merisan

Lack of Communication

I instructed Hugh James on a No Win, No Fee clinical negligence case following the loss of my baby at Lewisham Hospital due to medical malpractice. The case has been ongoing for around three years. Unfortunately, despite the extremely sensitive nature of this bereavement case, I experienced over two months of complete silence from my solicitor. Emails and phone calls were not returned, which caused significant distress and concern about the handling of my claim. I expected compassion, transparency, and basic communication. Sadly, this was not my experience.

0
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo
Profile image of Malcolm

Malcolm

Clinical Negligence

Three years to get almost nothing

Three years ago I started an action for clinical negligence against a GP. It was a "No-Win-No-Fee" action. Of course the famous phrase "No-Win-No-Fee" is not what most lay people think it is. It is a Condition Fee Agreement. You take out an After The Event insurance policy at the beginning. It's there to guarantee the huge legal fees that solicitors charge. If you lose then you pay nothing and get nothing. If you "win" then the premium is deducted from your award and a maximum of 25% Success Fee is also deducted. This is okay, but only so long as you actually WIN and the other side pay out proper compensation. Hugh James moved at the pace of an asthmatic snail on sedatives. Endless emails followed. Worst of all, they engaged a fantastically expensive neurologist, Dr Oliver Foster, who was a superb expert witness not just for me but also for the defence. Thus NHS Resolution, got away with offering a paltry £10,000, which after deductions as mentioned ended up as £7500. My actual medical expenses caused by this GP were approaching £6000, so I in effect ended up with £1500 - after three long years of stressful legal action. I would avoid them for this sort of litigation.

2
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo
Profile image of John and Family

John and Family

Verified

Very professional and compassionate

Loosing a loved one is tragic, especially following an accident for which someone else is responsible. Seeking equitable financial compensation could be a very stressful process, we chose Potter Rees Dolan to act on our behalf. Their team was very compassionate and understanding, thorough and exceedingly professional. Their communication throughout a four year process was constantly reassuring and the end result exceeded our expectations. Our grateful thanks. John and family.

Solicitors tagged in
this review

A representative from Hugh James responded to this review

Thank you so much for taking the time to leave a review, we really appreciate your comments and have passed these on to Sami and his team. Many thanks!

0
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo
Profile image of Sahar

Sahar

Verified

Trustworthy firm

Following being attacked in a traumatic armed robbery at my work place, I suffered from both mental and physical injuries. I was rejected two times for benefit claim to support me with my difficult life, part of it due to my PTSDA which led me not be able to explain my difficulties as it was a trigger to remind me the attack. At one point I found Potter Rees Dolan through google search, and while I didn’t have much hope, it all turned out to believe there are still good people who help others. Peter Renshaw assisted me with my appeal. If he wasn’t there I probably never came this far and just lived my difficult life. However with all his professionalism and caring manner he encouraged me to appeal the decision, patiently explained the procedure and advised me all through the way. The appeal was allowed by the judge and this could not happened if Peter Renshaw did not support me with my case. I highly recommend PRD and specifically Peter Renshaw and his team.

Solicitors tagged in
this review

A representative from Hugh James responded to this review

Thank you so much for taking the time to leave a review Sahar. we really appreciate your comments and have passed these on to Peter and his team. Many thanks!

0
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo
Profile image of Michelle

Michelle

Verified

Successful PIP claim

I dealt with Suzanne, she was recommended through headway(for head injuries) she was very professional and easy to talk to and approach. She communicated very well throughout the process and was patient when I called.

A representative from Hugh James responded to this review

Thank you so much for your five star review Michelle! We really appreciate your feedback and have passed this on to Suzanne. Thanks again!

0
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo

Reviews

2.7 /5 151 Reviews
Filter your results
Star rating

Rating

ReviewSolicitors Review List

Profile image of MARTYN WEBB

MARTYN WEBB

Never even got to speak to anyone.

Filled in their ''contact us'' form onljne on 7/04/25. The advert says they will get straight back to you. On 15/04/26 I rang to say no one had been in touch so the person on the phone arranged for someone to ring me at 12 o'clock on 16/04/26. Needless to say no one rang. So I rang again on 16/04/26 at 2pm and was told someone would ring me back in the next 45mins. Guess what.? I think this is an omen to NOT use Hugh James.

0
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo
Profile image of Merisan

Merisan

Lack of Communication

I instructed Hugh James on a No Win, No Fee clinical negligence case following the loss of my baby at Lewisham Hospital due to medical malpractice. The case has been ongoing for around three years. Unfortunately, despite the extremely sensitive nature of this bereavement case, I experienced over two months of complete silence from my solicitor. Emails and phone calls were not returned, which caused significant distress and concern about the handling of my claim. I expected compassion, transparency, and basic communication. Sadly, this was not my experience.

0
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo
Profile image of Malcolm

Malcolm

Clinical Negligence

Three years to get almost nothing

Three years ago I started an action for clinical negligence against a GP. It was a "No-Win-No-Fee" action. Of course the famous phrase "No-Win-No-Fee" is not what most lay people think it is. It is a Condition Fee Agreement. You take out an After The Event insurance policy at the beginning. It's there to guarantee the huge legal fees that solicitors charge. If you lose then you pay nothing and get nothing. If you "win" then the premium is deducted from your award and a maximum of 25% Success Fee is also deducted. This is okay, but only so long as you actually WIN and the other side pay out proper compensation. Hugh James moved at the pace of an asthmatic snail on sedatives. Endless emails followed. Worst of all, they engaged a fantastically expensive neurologist, Dr Oliver Foster, who was a superb expert witness not just for me but also for the defence. Thus NHS Resolution, got away with offering a paltry £10,000, which after deductions as mentioned ended up as £7500. My actual medical expenses caused by this GP were approaching £6000, so I in effect ended up with £1500 - after three long years of stressful legal action. I would avoid them for this sort of litigation.

2
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo
Profile image of martin

martin

incompetent, only interested in your money

dont waste your money.nice initially but nothing gets done,hard to get hold of, poor communication, errors,useless. i wished i looked at reviews first

4
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo
Profile image of T

T

Wouldn't wish them on my worst enemy

READ REVIEWS BEFORE YOU USE THIS SERVICE! Hugh James has been dealing with the probate of my late grandmother’s estate and have taken over 2 and a half years to process. As part of the estate I have been left a property which took 2 years to sign over to me as a benefactor and the moment that happened I was slapped with all the outstanding bills and have been told that as they are in my name, it’s now my responsibility and they are still holding a sizeable amount of money in their possession and I seem to have to chase them for updates on this frequently! This company has made a hard time even harder for myself and my family. I regret that my grandmother ever used this company and I’m sure she would be too! 2024- still no further along in the process and awaiting inheritance payments! I am disgusted by the service of this company and a property in Spain which has not been checked in 5.5 years. DO NOT USE THIS SERVICE! They prolong the process to build up interest on your money! I am currently dealing with my 5th case manager and each is as bad as the last. 6 YEARS LATER - Hugh James hadn't even sent a death certificate to the relevant bodies after I was assured it was done years ago! I have now raised a second complaint to their complaints department after being assured that the head of the team took over my case to finally transfer the rest of an estate, only for it to drop back down to associates who had already mishandled the case. After the first complaint, they admitted that their service was poor and refunded me a whole £125 when a foreign property has incurred charges due to not being transferred or foreign solicitors being updated. I wouldn't wish these guys on my worst enemy! Please note they do not respond to emails or google reviews, probably because that person is "out of office" too!

Solicitors tagged in
this review

4
Collected on: ReviewSolicitor collection source logo

Other Reviews

Profile image of Bessie

Bessie

Verified

Wills, Trusts and Probate

Polite, Punctual & Efficient

0
Collected on: Law_net collection source logo

Can This Law Firm Assist You?

Find the best legal expertise in the field, tailored to your needs. Assess availability, delve into specialist knowledge, and make informed decisions with transparency of cost.

Law firms are ranked based on past client experience. They can be evaluated by value, quality, and ethical standards, helping you find the firm you need.

See availability
Check expertise
Estimate Costs
Clear